Plus, why are they used as a reference if they don't represent real life values? And why is it that the MBP get so poor xBench results (40-73, average 57) compared with the G5, when real life tests show that the MBP is a lot closer to G5 performance than these tests show (Dual G5 average: 220, Quad average: 190. I know that these results depends of RAM configuration, graphic card and so on, but still: the results are really inconcistent, which makes be question how interesting benchmarks done by a benchmark program really are. Score 134.15 Results 134.15 System Info Xbench Version 1.3 System Version 10.6.3 (10D2125) Physical RAM 4096 MB Model MacBookPro7,1 Drive Type Hitachi HTS545032B9SA02 CPU Test 188.10 GCD Loop 312.21 16.46 Mops/sec Floating Point Basic 154.81 3.68 Gflop/sec vecLib FFT 123.78 4.08 Gflop/sec Floating Point Library 283.74 49. The results vary from 101 (actually, 23!) to 279. I would like to say that i thik i have a pretty good CPU, so why am i only getting 68 on my xbench scores If the benchmark results are set to a baseline of a 2GHz G5 then surely i should be getting somewhere near this I am currently running 10.4.5 natively, using the prepatched iso. I just had a look at some submitted benchmarks found at.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |